Rohit Sharma He looked like he was trying to hold back tears. Mohammad Siraj could not Jasprit BumrahOne who doesn’t let the results affect his emotions, comfort him. KL Rahul He sank to his knees. Virat Kohli Hiding the face in the hat. Mohammed Shami Went back disappointed.
the soul had left them.
it hurts Those who don’t play another World Cup will suffer even more. The next morning would be worse. Better to have their families with them. There is more to life than the World Cup. They need that boost on Monday morning when there’s no training to go to. They’ll need teammates to step up for those who don’t have family with them.
That’s the brutal nature of the league-knockout hybrid format. It will hurt India more than any team that has been knocked out earlier in the tournament. This is the price you pay: To fight for the greatest joy, you must risk the greatest heartbreak. It will hurt them more than it can hurt someone outside.
All those runs and wickets would seem empty, just like the seats vacated by people who had moved on to more mundane things like avoiding traffic jams before the last ball was bowled. All the gaiety and clamor that had bathed for a month and a half suddenly turned into a hollow hum. Rohit scored more runs in one tournament than any captain. Kohli has scored more runs than any other batsman. Shami was the highest wicket taker despite not playing four matches. At this point these facts mean nothing to them.
However, in world cricket with so much professionalism, the top-three teams have equal access to knowledge, facilities, technology and talent, it is still rare that you can beat the condition. in League match against Australia, India was on the right side of the condition. In the final they lost to the conditions.
An example of how much the pitch has changed is the number of times Marnus Labuschagne gently dabbed the ball behind square for singles; These simple singles were not available to India. The pitch was so sluggish in the afternoon that there was a risk of manipulating the bat face to pick singles if the pitch spread out and the ball got old. Kohli got out just like that, driving Pat Cummins into his stumps.
If Rohit’s words at the toss – he said he would have batted first if he had won – actually reflected the thinking of the team management (sometimes a captain’s words can only be forward), it would be fair to say that India misunderstood the terms. Australia won the toss and decided to play a different game.
India expected the pitch to continue to slow down and offer more turn, which it did Kolkata semi-final. They hoped to exploit the fragility of the Australian chase.
Australia has gone by recent trends. During this World Cup, batting has been consistently easy under the lights in Ahmedabad. They continued to rely on the pattern and expected a drier-than-usual pitch to be hardest in the afternoon. They wanted to exploit India’s relative weakness on the slower pitch.
Off the second ball he faced Josh Hazlewood, who dismissed him in the team’s league meeting, Rohit charged and smashed the ball through the covers for four. Rohit was playing the World Cup final as it should have been: another game. Throughout the tournament, he made it easy for India’s middle order by scoring faster than anyone else in the first powerplay.
Dravid: ‘Give it everything we had’
Rohit Sharma’s captaincy, the pitch for the final and India’s long trophy drought as India’s head coach
It was more important that Rohit did it here. Kohli also started well. Seeing Shubman Gill get out early, Kohli stuck to the team plan and dropped the risk-free game that brought him over 700 runs in the tournament. He took a risk by pulling Mitchell Starc to wide mid-on to face the ninth ball. It wasn’t a perfect shot, but Kohli knew he had to take that opportunity during the powerplay.
With the ball in hand, India had their initial spot-on plan. They allowed Shami to open the bowling because of his superior numbers against left-handed batsmen. Bumrah and Shami would have been pleasantly surprised by the help they got but that zip and that movement came at a cost. In the evening, this happened most noticeably For New Zealand against England In the tournament-opener, the pitch rose quickly and the ball had much less grip.
Once Australia weathered the opening storm, once the movement died down, only a brilliant delivery from Bumrah, a final reminder of the magic India have produced through this tournament, got them a wicket, the wicket of Steven Smith. The rest of the story we heard before long in India. Would India have won? 12 years ago in Wankhede Was there no dew?
There must be a review within the team. Rahul could have been bolder in the middle overs. Kohli has the game to score at a strike rate of 80 to 90 without hitting a boundary. Kohli got a delivery that picked up on that slower pitch and went big on it. Another day the inside edge would have gone past the leg stump. Not in this final.
Others have to take risks. Why Rahul didn’t take the risk is not rocket science. India’s batting is shallow. I asked the coaches on several occasions in press conferences how the batsmen reacted to India not batting at all. 7. Especially now that their view of risk has changed. The coaches maintain they don’t even want to think about it because the top seven is good enough to do the job. This was not seen at the Narendra Modi Stadium on Sunday.
‘Rohit and Kohli stood for India every moment – Anil Kumble
The former Indian captain and coach highlighted the achievements of the two senior batsmen, even as they failed to lift the World Cup
They will look back at just nine boundaries off a legal 180 in the middle overs and wonder if that was enough. It meant India hit just four boundaries outside the first powerplay, the joint-fewest in any ODI since 2005. On a slower pitch, the bowlers have a large margin for error, but India can only reply if they don’t try to push. Bowlers tighten their lengths a bit.
It’s not like there was any batting lower down order selection error. What Shardul Thakur brings to no. 8 is often national. There is no reason to believe that Siraj does not fill that national depth with what he brings with the ball compared to Tagore. The problem is, none of India’s first-choice bowlers like Starc and Pat Cummins bat.
You might look back and say India’s fast bowlers could have bowled more cutters, maybe the spinners could have gone slower in the air to try to turn the ball because there was something on the pitch not too long ago. They could have probably trusted Suryakumar Yadav more and not promoted Ravindra Jadeja to face a poor match against spin, which resulted in no purpose from 30 to 36 overs.
However, these are marginal issues. If Rahul had taken more risks, they might have gone but we know the flip side too. Players won’t say it, but the change in conditions from afternoon to evening was the biggest deciding factor. It doesn’t make them choker or less mentally strong or less brave. They have played so much cricket that they know they just have to roll with it.
And yet it will be most difficult for them to do so. They knew this feeling before, but it is not easy. And this time they are closer than ever since 2011. To fight for the greatest joy, you must risk the greatest heartbreak.